- Received November 28, 2023
- Accepted November 10, 2023
- Publication January 05, 2024
- Visibility 5 Views
- Downloads 1 Downloads
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijced.2023.036
-
CrossMark
- Citation
Role of dermoscopy in hyperpigmented skin disorders: A tertiary care centre experience
- Author Details:
-
Rutu Harsh Oza *
-
Shreya Agrwal
-
Jaydipkumar Tank
-
Amita Sutaria
-
Kirti S Parmar
-
Bela J Shah
-
Navin R Chaudhary
-
Kriteeka Saini
-
Harshita Vyas
-
Shikha R Shah
-
Deval Mistry
Rutu Harsh Oza *
Introduction
Dermoscopy, a non-invasive tool to examine microscopic details of skin lesions, allows visualization of surface and subsurface structures. Dermatoscope permits a better appreciation of morphology not visible by naked eye, thus opening a new dimension of evaluation.[1] ‘Dermoscopy’ term was introduced in 1921 by Saphier.[2] The first world dermoscopy congress, held in Rome in 2001, defined various structures seen in benign and malignant pigmentary disorders.[3]
Pigmented skin disorders are one of the most frequently encountered conditions in routine dermatology practice. This may be difficult to diagnose by gross macroscopic examination, specifically for Indian patients with dark skin. Dermoscopy helps to differentiate between melanocytic and non-melanocytic pigmented lesions and aids in diagnosing early malignant changes.[4]
Literature review suggested a paucity of real-world data from Indian patients for the role of dermoscopy in clinical practice. This study aimed to provide dermoscopic findings from Indian patients with various pigmented lesions.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective analysis was done from the evaluation of hospital records, for patients who presented to the dermatology outpatient department at tertiary care centre in western India, during the period of October 2015 to September 2018. Prior approval was taken from the Institutional Ethics Committee. All patients (both sex and age above 18 years) who had presented during the study period with hyperpigmented skin lesions were included in the study. Patients who had taken any treatment in last six months for the same were excluded. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. After a thorough clinical assessment, the dermoscopic examination was done for each patient using a dermatoscope (Dermlite DL3 - San Juan, Capistrano, CA, USA), with 10x magnification keeping approximately a distance of 1 inch from the skin surface. Dermoscopic findings were captured using a high-resolution camera.
All demographic, clinical, and dermoscopic details were collected in a pre-decided format. Punch skin biopsy was also performed in a few patients with equivocal results of clinical and dermoscopic findings.
A two-step method for dermoscopic classification of pigmented lesions was used: First, the lesions were differentiated as melanocytic versus non-melanocytic by the algorithm approved by Consensus Net Meeting Board, and then the lesions were further categorized as benign or malignant using the seven-point checklist method.[5]
Results
Total 352 patients satisfied selection criteria, 181 males (51.42%) and 171 females (48.57%). Punch biopsy results were also available for 105 patients. The maximum number of patients was in the age group of 21-30 years with the mean age being 35.5 years. Approximately 46% of the patients had a single lesion and the remaining 54% had multiple pigmented lesions.
Patients were divided into two categories clinically based on lesion characteristics as melanocytic and non-melanocytic lesions. [Table 1] outlines the number of patients in each category.
|
Category (n=total number in each category) |
Disease |
Number of patients (Total = 352) |
|
Melanocytic lesions (n = 272) |
Melanocytic nevus |
100 |
|
Melasma |
52 |
|
|
Lichen planus pigmentosus |
50 |
|
|
Freckles or lentigines |
30 |
|
|
Beckers nevus |
25 |
|
|
Ashy dermatosis |
5 |
|
|
Exogenous oochronosis |
4 |
|
|
Melanoma |
4 |
|
|
Bowen’s disease |
2 |
|
|
Non-melanocytic lesions |
Seborrheic keratosis |
58 |
|
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) |
22 |
Dermoscopic findings
Local features
The most common local feature observed was pigment network, seen in 45.2% of patients, followed in descending order by milia-like cysts, comedo-like openings, and blue-whitish veil; seen in 21.4%, 19% and 2.4% of patients respectively.
Global features
The most common global feature was reticular pattern; seen in 38.1% of patients. The other global features noted were parallel pattern in 9.5% of patients, globular pattern in 7.1%, and homogeneous pattern in 2.4% of patients.
elow provides details of various dermoscopic findings observed in patients with different hyperpigmented conditions.
Dermoscopic findings in melanocytic group
The most common clinical diagnosis for this category was benign melanocytic nevi. Out of 100 patients with benign melanocytic nevi, 30 patients had congenital whereas 70 patients had acquired lesions. Within the congenital variety, 28 out of 30 patients showed symmetrical findings. Twenty four out of thirty patients showed target networks. The next common observations in the congenital subtype, after the target network, were homogeneous diffuse pigmentation and blue-grey globules, seen in 20 and 19 patients respectively. [Figure 1]a shows clinical picture of congenital melanocytic nevus and [Figure 1]b shows associated dermoscopic findings- homogenous diffuse pigmentation, focal thickening of network lines, and terminal hair follicles. On the other hand, in the acquired subtype, reticular (38%) and globular (33%) networks were the most common findings with other patterns found less frequently. [Figure 2], [Figure 3] illustrate clinico-dermoscopic pattern of junctional and compound subtypes of acquired nevus respectively. Out of the 52 patients with the diagnosis of melasma, 42 (84%) had generalized brown pigmentation with a spared follicular opening. [Figure 4]a and c are clinical pictures of two different patients with melasma whereas [Figure 4]b and d depicts their respective dermoscopic findings. Similar dark brown pigmentation was present on dermoscopic examination in all 50 patients with clinically diagnosed lichen planus pigmentosus. Seventy percent of these patients also had pigment accentuation around acrosyringium. [[Figure 5] shows two patients with lichen planus pigmentosus involving face and legs respectively, with their dermoscopic and biopsy correlates]. In patients with freckles and lentigines, uniform pigmentation with moth-eaten edge and dark uniform network were the exclusive dermoscopic finding as shown in [Figure 6]. The majority (92%) of patients with Becker’s nevus showed increased hair follicles around the affected region ([Figure 7]). All four patients with exogenous oochronosis had arciform streaks. ([Figure 8] shows two patients with corresponding clinical / dermosopic / histological features of exogenous oochronosis) Similarly, all melanoma patients showed atypical pigment network. [Figure 9]a and d are clinical pictures from patients with melanoma. [Figure 9]b and e are classic dermoscopic findings of ulceration and atypical pigment network in these patients. [Figure 9]c and f are biopsy pictures from the same patients with presence of melanocytes. Patients with ashy dermatosis showed grey-blue pigmentation and bluish-black pigmentation (in 3 out of 5 for each finding) and brownish dots (in 2 out of 5 patients).
Dermoscopic findings in non-melanocytic group
Among the 80 patients with non-melanocytic lesions, 58 had seborrheic keratosis and remaining 22 had basal cell carcinoma. As seen in [Table 2], seven different dermoscopic findings were found in patients with seborrheic keratosis. [Figure 10] shows three patients with seborrheic keratosis involving different areas with their respective dermoscopic features. ([Figure 10]e also highlights histo-pathologic findings in seborrheic keratosis) The most prevalent dermoscopic findings in these patients were fissures and ridges (77%) ([Figure 10]b), comedo-like openings (69%), and cerebriform structures (60%). Patients with basal cell carcinoma, on dermoscopy, showed asymmetrical findings in the majority (90%). Other predomiant findings in basal cell carcinoma were ulcerations (81%), large ovoid nests (77%), and vascular structures (7%) ([Figure 11]b illustrates dermoscopic features of BCC- large black grey ovoid nests, linear blood vessels, micro-ulceration and keratotic scales and [Figure 11] a and c show clinical and biopsy correlates)
|
Category (Total number of patients) |
Condition (N= number of patients) |
Dermoscopic findings |
Number of patients with each specific finding (percentage) |
|
|
Melanoc-ytic lesions (272) |
1. Benign melanocytic nevi (100) [Congenital-30 & Acquired-70] |
Congenital type: (Total 30) |
Symmetry |
28 (93.33%) |
|
Target network |
24 (80%) |
|||
|
Homogeneous diffuse pigmentation |
20 (66.66%) |
|||
|
Blue-grey globules |
19 (63.33%) |
|||
|
Blotches |
16 (53.33%) |
|||
|
Perifollicular pigmentation |
11 (36.66%) |
|||
|
Focal thickening of network |
10 (33.33%) |
|||
|
Acquired type: (Acquired 70) |
Reticular network |
27 (38.54%) |
||
|
Globular pattern |
23 (32.85%) |
|||
|
Parallel pattern |
14 (20%) |
|||
|
Cobble-stone pattern |
2 (2.85%) |
|||
|
Homogeneous pattern |
2 (2.85%) |
|||
|
Multi-component pattern |
1 (1.42%) |
|||
|
Non-specific pattern |
1 (1.42%) |
|||
|
2. Melasma (52) |
Diffuse brown pigmentation with sparing of the follicular opening |
42 (84%) |
||
|
Diffuse dark brown to grey pseudo-reticular pigmentation |
10 (16%) |
|||
|
3. Lichen planus pigmentosus (LPP) (50) |
Dark brown pigmentation |
50 (100%) |
||
|
Pigment accentuation around acrosyringium |
35 (70%) |
|||
|
Heterogeneous colour distribution |
30 (60%) |
|||
|
Granular deposits |
30 (60%) |
|||
|
Pigment in a hem-like pattern |
15 (30%) |
|||
|
Wickham's striae. |
05 (10%) |
|||
|
4. Freckles and lentigines (30) |
Uniform pigmentation with moth-eaten edge |
29 (97%) |
||
|
Dark uniform network |
8 (27%) |
|||
|
5. Becker’s nevus (25) |
Increased hair follicles in affected areas |
23 (92%) |
||
|
Pigment network |
20 (80%) |
|||
|
Skin furrow hypopigmentation. |
13 (52%) |
|||
|
6. Ashy dermatosis (5) |
Grey-blue dots |
3 (60%) |
||
|
Bluish black pigmentation |
3 (60%) |
|||
|
Brownish dots |
2 (40%) |
|||
|
7. Exogeneous oochronosis (4) |
Irregular brown or grey globular, annular, and arciform streaks |
4 (100%) |
||
|
8. Melanoma (4) |
Atypical pigment network |
4 (100%) |
||
|
Regression structures, vascular structures, irregular dots, and globules, bluish-white veil |
2 (50%) |
|||
|
Irregular streaks on dermoscopy |
1 (25%) |
|||
|
9. Bowen’s disease (2) |
Atypical vascular structures or glomerular vessels |
2 (100%) |
||
|
Homogenous areas of greyish pigmentation |
1 (50%) |
|||
|
Non-melanocytic lesions (80) |
1. Seborrheic keratosis (58) |
Fissures and ridges |
45 (77.59%) |
|
|
Comedo like openings |
40 (69%) |
|||
|
Cerebriform structures |
35 (60.34%) |
|||
|
Fingerprint like pattern |
28 (50%) |
|||
|
Milia like cysts |
25 (43.10%) |
|||
|
Blue grey globules |
12 (20.69%) |
|||
|
7. Basal cell carcinoma (22) |
Asymmetry in dermoscopic findings |
20 (90.91%) |
||
|
Ulcerations or erosions |
18 (81.81%) |
|||
|
Large blue-grey ovoid nests |
17 (77.27%) |
|||
|
Vascular structures |
16 (72.73%) |
|||
|
Blue-grey globules |
15 (68.18%) |
|||
|
Spoke wheel areas |
5 (22.73%) |
|||
|
Maple leaf-like areas |
3 (13.64%) |
Histopathological findings
Only 105 patients had undergone a biopsy out of the total of 352 in the study. As shown in [Table 3], the maximum results for patients undergoing biopsy were showing seborrheic keratosis and basal cell carcinoma with 21 and 20 patients respectively. This also pointed out that more than half of the patients with non-melanocytic lesions required biopsy for confirmation. Interestingly, 102 out of 105 patients with biopsy results had dermoscopic findings suggestive of a similar diagnosis. One patient with biopsy confirmed basal cell carcinoma had dermoscopic findings in favour of Bowen’s disease and two patients of biopsy confirmed lichen planus had dermoscopy suggestive of ashy dermatosis.
|
Histopathological diagnosis |
Number of patients |
|
Seborrheic keratosis |
21 |
|
Basal cell carcinoma pigmented variant |
20 |
|
Lichen planus pigmentosus |
20 |
|
Acquired melanocytic nevi |
18 |
|
Melasma |
07 |
|
Freckles |
06 |
|
Melanoma |
04 |
|
Exogenous oochronosis |
02 |
|
Pigmented Bowen’s disease |
02 |
Discussion
Hyperpigmented skin lesions are a wide spectrum of skin disorders that includes both melanocytic and non-melanocytic skin lesions. It is important to differentiate benign from malignant for the correct line of treatment. As it may not be feasible to take a biopsy in all cases, non-invasive alternatives such as dermoscopy can aid in diagnostic certainty to the naked eye observation.
Pigmented lesions can be melanocytic or non-melanocytic. Observation of pigmentation in dermoscopy can be correlated with melanin within keratinocytes or melanocytes. Dermoscopy can suggest melanocytic lesions by the presence of a pigment network, pseudo network, aggregated globules, branch streaks, and parallel patterns. On the other side, non-melanocytic lesions have different characteristic findings. Seborrheic keratosis presents as milia-like cysts, comedo-likeopenings, fissures and ridges, sharp demarcation with fingerprint-like structures, and hair pin-like blood vessels while pigmented BCC shows arborizing vessels, maple leaf-like areas, spoke wheel areas with ulcerations. [6]
In our study, 69% of patients with seborrheic keratosis had comedo-like openings which can be correlated pathologically with keratin-filled follicular openings. Another feature, milia-like cysts, found in 43.10% of patients with seborrheic keratosis, can be correlated with intraepidermal horn cysts. Similar results were seen in the study done by Rajesh G et al [7] where fissures and ridges were seen in 100% of patients (77.59% in the present study) and comedo-like openings in 64% (69% in the present study).
Dermoscopic features of pigmented BCC were first reported by Puspok-Schwartz et al. [8] In this report, findings from 25 BCC patients were compared with 25 melanomas. Arborizing vessels were found in 52% of pigmented BCC and described as the strongest model for diagnosing BCC. In our study we found 72.73% pigmented BCC with arborizing vessels. The basal cell carcinoma dermoscopically showed erosions/ulcerations in 81.81% of patients in the present study. These erosions were one of the defining features of BCC as shown by Menzies et al. [9] In 2005, Menzies et al defined dermoscopic features of pigmented BCCs. According to them, diagnosis of pigmented BCC is based on the absence of a pigment network with the presence of at least one of the following features: arborizing vessels, large blue-grey ovoid nests, multiple grey-blue globules, ulceration, maple leaf-like areas, spoke wheel areas.
The present study included 50 patients of lichen planus pigmentosus, where dark brown pigment network was seen in 100 % of patients and pigment accentuation around acrosyringium was observed in 70%. Similar findings were seen in a study by Gungor S et al [10] where the numbers for dark brown pigment network and pigment accentuation around acrosyringium were 100% and 53.3% respectively.
In the present study, in patients with ashy dermatosis, grey-blue dots with blue-black pigmentation were found in 60% of patients while 40% of cases had brownish dots. The findings corroborated with the study of Garg P. et al [11] where brownish dots were seen in 50% of cases and blue-grey dots in 25% of cases.
In patients with junctional nevi, the prevalent pattern of reticular pigmentation was associated with the presence of nevoid cells at the dermo-epidermal junction, whereas in patients with compound nevi, the common globular pigment pattern represented the presence of nevoid cells both in the basal layer and dermis. These findings were in accordance with the findings of Zalaudek I et al. [12] Reticular pattern was noted more frequently in the present study due to the rete ridge pattern of the epidermis, in which relatively hypopigmented dots represent dermal papillae and overlying epidermis. The globular pattern was commonly seen in patients with compound nevi presenting as homogenous globules distributed throughout the lesion. These globules were more than 0.1mm in size and represent a nest of melanocytes. The cobblestone pattern is formed by a conglomeration of these globules, [13] which was observed in 2% of cases of acquired melanocytic nevi.
In patients with melanoma, dermoscopic findings of irregular pigment network corresponded histologically to the presence of invasive melanoma cells in the epidermis/ upper dermis, whereas blue-white veil corresponded to lymphocytes or melanophages in the dermis. The vascular structures dermoscopically corresponded to intense vascularisation with different sizes of vessels. Similar correlations were described by Ungureanu et al.[14] Even though melanoma incidence is relatively low in India, it was noted in 1.13% of patients (4 patients) in our study.
The present study showed 25 patients of Becker’s nevus, with increased terminal hair follicles in the affected area (92%), pigment network (80%), and furrow hypopigmentation (52%) being the commonest findings. These results were in concordance with the study done by Ingordo V et al with 64 patients of Becker’s nevus. [15]
Out of the total 52 melasma patients, 42 patients (84%) showed diffuse brown pigmentation with sparing of follicular opening and 10 patients (16%) had diffuse dark brown to greyish pseudoreticular pigmentation on dermoscopy. Our findings were in agreement with dermoscopic findings of melasma mentioned by Dr Sarkar R et al. [16] All four patients of Exogenous oochronosis showed irregular brown/grey globular, annular and arciform streaks on dermoscopy as described similarly by Gil et al.[17] Dermoscopy aided in differentiating melasma form exogenous oochronosis by the presence of dark brown or grey accentuated reticular pseudo network in the former versus arciform pattern in the later.
Both patients with Pigmented Bowen’s disease showed glomerular vessels and one of them had homogeneous areas of greyish pigmentation on dermoscopy which is consistent with findings described by Hernandez-Gil et al. [18]
In our study, dermoscopy could differentiate melanocytic versus non-melanocytic pigmented lesions. It also helped in diagnosis of clinical look-alike lesions such as melasma versus exogenous oochronosis, and lichen planus pigmentosus versus ashy dermatosis. The disappearance of dermoscopic disease-specific findings on follow-up also provided a clue for response to treatment.
Study Limitation
This was a retrospective single-centre study.
Conclusion
Our study provides valuable data for dermoscopic findings of various hyperpigmented lesions in clinical practice. It helps to bridge the gap between confirmatory biopsy findings and clinical observations. The use of dermatoscope on a routine basis may help to increase precision in hyperpigmented skin lesions without the need for invasive biopsy. Further large-scale multi-centric studies are required to compare findings of dermoscopy with confirmatory biopsy results.
Conflict of Interest
None.
Conflict of Interest
None.
References
- HP Soyer, G Argenziano, S Chimenti, V Ruocco. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions. Eur J Dermatol 2001. [Google Scholar]
- J Saphier. Die Dermatoskopie. Arch f Dermat 1921. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- AA Marghoob, J Malvehy, RP Braun. . An Atlas of Dermoscopy 2004. [Google Scholar]
- F Kaliyadan. The scope of the dermoscope. Indian Dermatol Online J 2016. [Google Scholar]
- J Malvehy, S Puig, G Argenziano, AA Marghoob, HP Soyer. International Dermoscopy Society Board members. Dermoscopy report: proposal for standardization. Results of a consensus meeting of the International Dermoscopy Society. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007. [Google Scholar]
- RP Braun, HS Rabinovitz, M Oliviero, AW Kopf, JH Saurat. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005. [Google Scholar]
- G Rajesh, DM Thappa, TJ Jaisankar, L Chandrashekar. Spectrum of seborrheic keratoses in South Indians: a clinical and dermoscopic study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2011. [Google Scholar]
- M Püspök-Schwarz, A Steiner, M Binder, B Partsch, K Wolff, H Pehamberger. Statistical evaluation of epiluminescence microscopy criteria in the differential diagnosis of malignant melanoma and pigmented basal cell carcinoma. Melanoma Res 1997. [Google Scholar]
- SW Menzies, K Westerhoff, H Rabinovitz, AW Kopf, WH Mccarthy, B Katz. Surface microscopy of pigmented basal cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Ş Güngör, IO Topal, EK Göncü. Dermoscopic patterns in active and regressive lichen planus and lichen planus variants: a morphological study. Dermatol Pract Concept 2015. [Google Scholar]
- P Garg, T Kaur, S K Malhotra, A Singh. Study of the Dermoscopic Findings and Their Correlation with Histopathological Findings in Various Lichenoid Dermatoses. J Clin Exp Dermatol Res 2015. [Google Scholar]
- I Zalaudek, G Docimo, G Argenziano. Using dermoscopic criteria and patient-related factors for the management of pigmented melanocytic nevi. Arch Dermatol 2009. [Google Scholar]
- BK Rao, SQ Wang, FP Murphy. Typical dermoscopic patterns of benign melanocytic nevi. Dermatol Clin 2001. [Google Scholar]
- L Ungureanu, S Şenilă, S Dănescu, L Rogojan, R Cosgarea. Correlation of dermatoscopy with the histopathological changes in the diagnosis of thin melanoma. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2013. [Google Scholar]
- V Ingordo, SS Iannazzone, F Cusano, L Naldi. Dermoscopic Features of Congenital Melanocytic Nevus and Becker Nevus in an Adult Male Population: An Analysis with a 10-Fold Magnification. Dermatology 2006. [Google Scholar]
- R Sarkar, P Arora, V K Garg, S Sonthalia, N Gokhale. Melasma update. Indian Dermatol Online J 2014. [Google Scholar]
- I Gil, S Segura, E Martínez-Escala, J Lloreta, S Puig, M Vélez. Dermoscopic and reflectance confocal microscopic features of exogenous oochronosis. Arch Dermatol 2010. [Google Scholar]
- J Hernández-Gil, MA Fernández-Pugnaire, C Serrano-Falcón, S Serrano-Ortega. Clínica y dermoscopia de la enfermedad de Bowen pigmentada. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2008. [Google Scholar]